Jobs demos iPad for WSJ, trashes Flash

February 19, 2010

The ongoing shooting war between Apple and Adobe takes a decidedly Flash favorable turn with a Gawker rewrite of the Apple CEO’s visit to the Wall Street Journal, delivering a canard (and correction) laden take on recent events in New York.

Gawker uses some familiar phrases — reality distortion field, dark side — to characterize Steve Jobs recent iPad demo at Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal. It’s said that a select group of editor’s at the News Corporation publication heard the Apple CEO pitch the soon-to-be-released tablet device, as well as a Flash-free future.

Here’s the hearsay:

• Running Flash on the iPad could reduce useable battery time from 10 to 1.5 hours

• Flash is dead technology, like the floppy drive

• Using H.264 to replace Flash for video and vector graphics would be (large grain o’ salt) “trivial”

These “Jobs said” events are starting to read like scripted material rather than news or even a recitation of actual events. Further, much like Adobe’s purported “kill HTML5 at any cost” Web postings, a judicious application of salt is advised.

Also, whereas New York Times editors and managers purportedly gnash their teeth over meaty details, like subscription pricing and which department will handle this “new” content delivery vehicle, Wall Street Journal editors seem to have only one thing on their minds and, though killing Flash would be a bit more than trivial, it’s hard to imagine that’s the only or even most important thing on their minds…

What’s your take?



Related Posts:

3 Responses to “Jobs demos iPad for WSJ, trashes Flash”

  1. iKidNot:

    If not for Apple, I may have had the terrible experience of playing free Flash games and watching free Flash videos on my iPad…..

    Apple Saves Us from Burden of Choice
    http://ikidnot.blogspot.com/2010/02/apple-saves-us-from-burden-of-choice.html

  2. Ronald O Carlson:

    Not as simple as you say, Simon:

    http://mac.blorge.com/2010/02/21/why-flash-on-ipad-is-useless/

  3. JohnJ:

    Re: Reduced battery life. I can buy this happening if one were to run intensive Flash apps non-stop, but then the same applies to any intensive apps running non-stop. CPU usage=power draw regardless of the source. People seem to think that simply installing Flash will somehow destroy battery life. It does so no more than any other app; i.e. only when running and doing something the user wants.

Leave a Reply:


Recent stories

Featured stories

RSS Technology news

RSS Windows News

RSS iPhone & Touch

RSS Mobile technology news

RSS Green tech

RSS Buying guides

RSS Gaming news

RSS Photography news

Archives

Copyright © 2012 Blorge.com NS